Standard user vs admin

On a surface pro that I installed it, I did it on a user that is not an admin. I right clicked on the package and installed as administrator. It asked for admin creeds It installed okay until when it needs access to install Killproc then at that point the install failed. Gave me an option to retry, abort, and cancel. I had to cancel. I logged in using a user that had admin rights and the install went fine. found my server and it backed up like i previously posted. tested a restore it worked but when i went to do a restore of an individual file by right clicking on the file and accessing the backups it pop a window that state could not find the URL. Switched to the admin user and it resolved it.

So can you access version of a file as a standard user?

hmm not one else uses standard users

Seems to me, to be a legit state, esp if it’s on a shared client - otherwise it means that User1 could recover from backups something from User2’s profile…

With it being limited to admin accounts, then it’s at least the same access as on the machine itself, where the admin can grant themselves access to the other profiles…

Just my thoughts, and I don’t have any issues with the existing situation…

Bear in mind that you can always log into the UrBackup web interface to download any individual files or [zipped] folders directly to the client…which sounds like it negates the issue with recovery you are seeing…

I wanted the ability for the user to recover, however in a control settings the admin would be the person restoring the file. so it should be good

Thanks for your input